Despite entering service in , the M1 Abrams remained untested in combat until the Gulf War in , where it was to be confronted by its archenemy the Iraqi-assembled Soviet-designed T Entering production in , the T arguably outstripped its contemporaries in a balance of mobility, protection and firepower. By the time of Operation Desert Storm, however, the tables had turned and the tank suffered due to low quality ammunition and poorly trained crews.
In this fascinating study, Steven Zaloga pits these two great fighting machines against one another, plotting the development of the Cold War until both tanks met in combat in the deserts of Iraq and Kuwait. Get A Copy. Paperback , 80 pages. Published August 18th by Osprey Publishing first published January 1st More Details Original Title. Other Editions 7.
- Has the Adjustment Process Worked? (Policy Analyses in International Economics)?
- Handbook Of Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders, Volume I: Conceptual Issues And Neurobiological Advances.
- 100 Science Words Every College Graduate Should Know?
Friend Reviews. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about M1 Abrams vs T Ural , please sign up. Be the first to ask a question about M1 Abrams vs T Ural. Lists with This Book.
This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Community Reviews. Showing Rating details.
More filters. Sort order. Feb 13, Atakan İskender rated it it was amazing. Although the book mainly covers the effectiveness of tanks, information has been given on other factors affecting the tank battle. It is a must-read book for those interested in military history and especially the dynamics of modern armored combat. Sep 05, James Yee rated it really liked it.
M1 Abrams vs T-72 Ural
I like these extended-length page Osprey books. A nice quick read that has me considering looking for more detailed accounts of the armor warfare of Desert Storm. Mar 10, Steven Peterson rated it really liked it. This represents one entry in the Osprey Duel series. This slender volume focuses on the tank combat in Desert Storm, in Indeed, as the author notes at the outset, the tank combat in Iraq may have served as something of a model for what might have happened had Warsaw Pact and NATO forces engaged in combat.
Both sides in Desert Storm had significant armored forces. Outcomes in battle were a This represents one entry in the Osprey Duel series. Outcomes in battle were a function of two factors--the ability of the tanks and the training and performance of the tank crews. Both have to be accounted for. Early on, as with other books examining weapons systems, design, development, and technical specifications of the tanks are provided.
ISBN 13: 9781846034077
Pages 15 and 23 provide tank to tank comparisons although it is annoying that physical dimensions are in feet for the M-1 and in the metric system for the T Then, there is a discussion of the crews. The m-1 had a crew of 4 and the T of 3. American crews were, overall, better trained and better fit for field combat.
Iraqi tankers tended to be rather poorly trained--a genuine hazard once combat began.
Next, the strategic thinking of the two opponents are discussed and--then--the actual fighting. The end result was a battering of the Iraqi forces. More American tanks were destroyed by friendly fire than by Iraqi tanks. A nice brief volume on tank versus tank in Operation Desert Storm. An interesting look! I gave this 5 stars as I found the development histories and technical data is fascinating, as well as the use of the words of participants. Not only that, but it gives an excellent overview of th disparity between the two forces, and also the gun sight views and explanations are amazing.
Great book, shows you a lot of why the M1A1 easily defeated the T in Iraq. Jan 23, Jeff rated it really liked it. A short but very good book about these two modern tanks and how the faced off against each other in Operation Desert Storm. Here the machines of war are compared and contrasted in a very specific way.
Classic debates over which side had the best equipment are examined in detail, but the examination goes beyond just reviewing the equipment; training and doctrine are also included in order to give a context. Zaloga takes an in-depth look at the two primary tanks that faced off in Operation Desert Storm. I have heard veterans of that conflict claim that the sides could have switched equipment and the US and its allies would have still beaten the Iraqis due to their level of training.
Zaloga cites his own sources who echo that sentiment, and then places both sides? He may not answer that question definitively, but the thorough investigation of both the M1 and the T leave few stones unturned.
M1 Abrams Vs T Ural by Steven Zaloga, Jim Laurier | Waterstones
Naturally many of the specifications of the M1 remain military secrets. Zaloga admits he doesn? The discussion ranges from the historical evolution of these tanks, construction, armor composition, comparative analysis of the armor? During the discussion of the book the ghosts of the Cold War linger.
The unanswered questions that wargamers love to ask,? No open conflict ever arose between NATO and the Warsaw Pact, but Zaloga does his best to not only examine the circumstances and equipment surrounding these two Cold War mainstays in Iraq, but he also attempts to share as much information as he can about how a conflict between the Pact and NATO might have seen these two tanks perform.
The primary focus of the book is on the clash between US and Iraqi tankers, and Zaloga does a superb job in highlighting where the Iraqi army melted like butter and why and where, in a few instances, it stood bravely as the M1s and their crews shredded them regardless. Readers interested in a comparison of these two tanks will find M1 Abrams vs T Ural a compact and handy reference for quickly determining the relative strengths and weaknesses of each.
Readers interested in a concise account of US versus Iraqi armor during Operation Desert Storm will also enjoy the account.